Using AI to produce content is tempting. Time savings, endless ideas, drafts in seconds. But there's a downside that few coaches and consultants anticipate: after a few weeks, their content looks like everyone else's. Smooth, polished, generic. The voice that made them different has evaporated, replaced by algorithm prose that your potential clients no longer recognize.
The good news is that the problem doesn't come from AI itself, but from how you use it. When properly configured and guided, it can amplify your voice instead of drowning it out. You just need to know how.
What AI does naturally (and why it's a problem)
↪ Read also : ChatGPT for consultants: 10 prompts that change everything
A language model is trained on the average. It produces what is statistically probable, what looks like what everyone has already written. Result: introductions that all start with "In an ever-changing world…", five-point lists, conclusions that "invite reflection". It's correct. It's harmless. And it's exactly what your prospects forget three seconds after reading.
Your value as a coach or consultant is precisely your singular point of view. Your thinking shortcuts, your odd phrasings that hit home, your bold positions that divide. Left to itself, AI will sand away all of that. Not out of malice, but because it optimizes for smoothness, not character.
Build your "voice guide" before prompting
Before asking AI for anything, you need to give it a concrete reference for your voice. Not a vague description ("I'm direct and warm"), but real examples. Take three to five texts you've written yourself that truly feel like you — a newsletter, a LinkedIn post, a client email. These are your master samples.
Based on these examples, write a one-page document that you'll copy and paste at the start of every AI session. It contains: your typical sentence length, the words you use (and the ones you ban), your relationship with humor, your level of formality, your signature stylistic quirks. This document is your vocal fingerprint in prose form. The more precise it is, the less the AI drifts.
The skeleton method: you first, AI second
The worst way to use AI is to give it a title and expect a full article. You get something technically valid but devoid of you. The best way is to reverse the logic: you provide the substance, AI handles the formatting.
Concretely, start by jotting down in rough notes — even messy bullet points — your angle, your personal example, your position, what you want the reader to take away. Ten scribbled lines are enough. Then give this draft to AI along with your voice guide and ask it to "structure and refine without changing the substance or style". You remain the author. It's the editor.
Red flags that betray AI-generated content
After generation, read with a critical eye. Certain phrasings are near-certain markers of unrevised text. If you see them, delete them or rewrite them by hand:
- ✦ Empty superlatives: "essential", "unmissable", "revolutionary" — replace with specific facts.
- ✦ Mechanical transitions: "Furthermore", "Moreover", "It should be noted that" — cut or replace with a clean break.
- ✦ Weak conclusions: "Don't hesitate to contact me for more information" — say something true instead.
- ✦ Absence of position: if no sentence could cost you a subscriber, the text isn't you enough.
Human editing remains non-negotiable. Not to fix typos, but to reinject your personality where AI has sanded too hard. Budget twenty minutes of active editing for each generated text. That's the real cost of intelligent delegation.
Train AI over time like a true collaborator
A tool like ChatGPT or Claude can remember your preferences if you feed it correctly. Create a "project" or dedicated conversation thread for your content production. With each good output, explicitly tell it what works. With each poor output, explain why. Over time, adjustments accumulate and the model better understands your register.
Go further by regularly submitting your best published texts with the instruction: "Analyze what I've written and update your understanding of my style." This isn't manipulation: it's onboarding, exactly as you would with a human assistant joining your team. The more you invest in this training, the less you need to correct afterward.
Content that converts remains human
Your clients don't buy you a generic service. They buy a way of seeing, a way of thinking, a relationship. Every piece of content you publish is a preview of what it's like to work with you. If that content could have been written by anyone, it doesn't make people want to work with you specifically.
AI is a formidable production accelerator, but it will never replace the anecdote that only you have lived, the opinion that only you dare to voice, the doubt that only you accept to expose publicly. These elements don't get generated. They get decided. And that's precisely what makes all the difference in a market saturated with perfect, anonymous content.
"AI can mimic ten thousand voices. It cannot invent yours. It's up to you to decide whether it amplifies it or erases it."